🔗 Share this article

In contemporary Britain, public demonstration is no longer a basic freedom. Instead, it has become a privilege that those in power allow or withhold at their discretion. This represents the implication of new regulations that the current government is putting forward, which would determine when and where demonstrations can occur, with possible imprisonment for those who disobey these restrictions.

Gradual Weakening of Democratic Rights

Earlier governments had already undermined this fundamental freedom: the former Conservative government had given law enforcement extensive new authorities, which global rights bodies had censured as "serious and undue restrictions" on democratic freedoms. Taken together, these progressive assaults on liberty have practically abolished the historically earned right to freedom of protest.

Using Tragedy to Justify Crackdown

The latest restrictive measures are being justified by citing last week's terrible anti-Jewish assault on a British Islamic center. We can all agree on widespread consensus that the security of British Jews must be safeguarded. However, employing this horrific incident as a justification to stifle opposition is not only unrelated to that responsibility but distorts it.

"If you can't set boundaries at genocide, you probably can't establish limits at democracy," commented a well-known American author, a statement that rings true for the current government.

Historical Perspective of Protest

Reflect on Britain's long tradition of protest and direct action against racism and fascism, from the 1936 Battle of Cable Street to postwar Jewish groups opposing fascism and the 1970s mobilizations against the far-right organization. Many of these early protesters were branded as radicals in their era, even while they were advocating the rights of marginalized groups.

Current Reality

In the current complicated landscape, here's what's truly happening: The Israeli government – a sovereign nation – is committing what United Nations investigations have described as genocide. Its warfare have prompted the International Criminal Court to release arrest warrants against Benjamin Netanyahu and his former defense minister.

International popular sentiment has shifted dramatically against Israel's violent actions. In Britain, a substantial majority of the public think Israel has probably committed war crimes. Most people would endorse a total prohibition on weapons exports to the state, and back the arrest of Netanyahu.

Silencing Dissent

Having largely lost the public debate, pro-Israel advocates are now seizing on a despicable anti-Jewish attack to attempt to silence a popular campaign against a ethical disaster. The British government appears to be included in this attempt. Ministers have not enacted comprehensive sanctions on Israel and have permitted arms exports to proceed.

People who are protesting against the erasure of Gaza have been characterized as hateful extremists. Yet there's a important factor why there hasn't been a more extensive suppression on these demonstrators until now: extremely few protesters have made genuinely hateful statements about Jewish people, giving police authorities little justification to intervene.

Dangerous Conflation

Equating Jewish identity with the policies of the Israeli state is not only cynical but also dangerous. The standard interpretation of antisemitism, accepted by the British government and many organizations, has been appropriately questioned for potentially restricting valid commentary of Israel. However, there should be universal agreement about one of its central illustrations: that "making Jewish people generally accountable for decisions of the state of Israel" constitutes antisemitism.

Escalating Restrictions

This is why we've reached a situation where police authorities can suggest that protests criticizing Israel's policies should be canceled because they might "accidentally or intentionally" support anti-Jewish sentiment. Similarly, government officials have stated that recognition of Palestine as a nation has made political parties "complicit" in alleged abuse faced by Jewish communities.

Double Standards

On the very day as the synagogue attack, the Israeli military killed dozens of Palestinian civilians in Gaza – adding to the horrific toll from two years of ongoing violence that have taken many thousands of human lives. British politicians and media outlets have hardly hidden the limited value they attach to Palestinian existence. This represents one of the boldest expressions of racism in our time.

Breaking Boundaries

Our government has already passed a concerning threshold by banning Palestine Action, a peaceful, human rights-focused activist collective. Multiple thousands of British protesters have been arrested, mostly for carrying placards against genocide and endorsing the banned organization. Many of those detained are pensioners; among them a former clergyman and the child of a Holocaust survivor.

Global Comparisons

It's easy to see where this path leads. In the United States, government officials helped vilify pro-Palestinian protests: a ex-political leader suggested that some were "connected to" other nations, while the current president characterized such demonstrations as antisemitic. In taking these actions, they helped legitimize the repressive measures on such demonstrations – and on freedom of expression in general.

Future Concerns

If a conservative administration comes to power, it would be granted sweeping powers to control dissent. What might a Reform government do with this restrictive framework? Our forebears fought, suffered and died to secure our freedoms. We may ultimately regret how casually we permitted them to be eroded.