🔗 Share this article

Only two days prior to the NYC race for mayor, Michael Lange made a significant forecast – going beyond the winner citywide, and precinct by precinct. Lange, a political analyst who grew up in the city, has spent over a decade in left-leaning activism and has become a kind of local celebrity recently for his deep dives into city data and voter surveys.

He published his highly detailed forecast map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani was victorious although failed to predict the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his newsletter, his platform. He has a flair for witty coinages. He pointed out, for instance, the split between the progressive stronghold, running from one neighborhood to another area to Astoria, where he forecasted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would win by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, “the Free Press and financial newspapers outrank the mainstream paper” in audience and most voters favored Cuomo, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Trends and Unexpected Results

How was your night?

It was necessary because they were dropping approximately 200K ballots into the tally frequently! I was actually a little nervous initially: Mamdani was ahead the early vote by 12 points, but came two big batches of votes that came in after that and his lead dropped from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, there was a world where yesterday turned out somewhat badly for Mamdani, where the opponent would have essentially doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. However Mamdani added 500,000 supporters to his initial base, and this was critical why he won. He campaigned and massively expanded his support from the primary.

Coalition Building

Where did the mayor-elect gain those extra votes from?

He built the coalition that the left always wanted to build: diverse racially, youthful, tenants and it’s people facing cost pressures. He gained considerably with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the earlier election. Plus he further maximized his base of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He built the coalition that the left long aimed for: diverse, youthful, renters and residents squeezed by affordability

There were also some Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It is a genuine phenomenon, limited to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Muslims. Voters in ethnic enclaves that went for the former president last year went for the progressive this year. However it’s not that he was gaining white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Turnout and Impact

A major development of the election was the sky-high turnout. Who benefited?

Both sides. Participation was much greater than anticipated. I thought we might exceed 2 million, but it reached 2.3 million – that is a lot of darn voters. Existed a decent anti-Mamdani block, energized, but his supporters was equally driven, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Currently it appears he’s likely to surpass half. He has 50.4% but remain probably 200,000 votes left to report as of Wednesday morning. So it’s not certain, but I think it’s likely, and I hope he does so then no one can say the Republican was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His vote completely collapsed.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any borough. Not even one neighborhood in the borough, which is like an 88% Trump area. That truly was unexpected. Cuomo held Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added all of these Republicans on Staten Island with a high participation. I believe occurred a lot of tactical voting by the Republicans. This happened prior to the former president endorsed for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome if Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your much mentioned left-wing base – was support for Mamdani dominant in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think there was a little dilution of the commie corridor in certain places like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, instance, the property owners and homeowners supported Cuomo. Thus there was a little resistance. But no, mostly the commie corridor is a key factor why Mamdani won – he scored between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

Prior to the vote there was coverage on whether the candidate was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

There are neighborhoods with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – like specific locales – where he performed strongly. However in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance definitely mattered there. Likewise in the moderate communities like Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. Plus, you have newcomers from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, who were strongly Cuomo. So it’s unclear if existed major surprises here, but he did hold left-leaning areas and even parts of the another locale by big margins.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what New York represents in politics? Will commie corridor become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s not accidental that key political leaders from the left hail from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I believe that there will be additional examples – people will come from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

However I believe that each urban center in America can have similar progressive hubs. Cities are the centers of leftwing power in the nation – since they’re young, people rent and they are places where people are crushed by the disparities exist.