🔗 Share this article

Recently, the game developers introduced a fresh playlist called Relaxed Breakthrough. To put it simply, this option mirrors the standard Breakthrough format but features several key changes:

• Each team includes only eight real players, with the remaining filled by AI-controlled opponents.
• Actions performed by real players grant full XP, while AI activities provide lower rewards.
• Just a pair of maps are available: Siege of Cairo and Empire State.
• Elements like Dogtags, achievements, and career stat updates are disabled.

In short, the playlist delivers on its title: it offers a laid-back version of Breakthrough. At face value, you might think there's nothing wrong, since it gives additional choices for gamers seeking alternative methods to enjoy the title. However, if video games has shown one thing, it is that you can't please everyone. In other words, many Battlefield 6 players are mad.

Player Responses: Anger to Support

"Gamers prefer real players. Don't repeat the errors of your competitors," states a response to the mode reveal. "Absolutely shocking idea," says a different user. At the same time, on the Battlefield subreddit, a player notes, "It's unclear where we are going with this title," and another details all the issues they consider to be broken in Battlefield 6: "Fix bugs, fix drone glitch, correct rocket mechanics, fix [the] bloom after sprinting bug, improve hit detection. We don't need this AI-heavy playlist."

However, for every complaint, there are players explaining how much they're enjoying the new mode. "It's very fun to warm up, real players prevent it from being a complete grind but it's quite laid-back," reads a forum post. "The community fails to see that there are players who have lives and can't play this title all the time. Allow them to find a middle ground," adds another. A response via social media explains that as they're "a parent gamer with busy schedules, this is great for me," and another praises the mode for "not being overcompetitive."

Valid Criticisms and Community Input

All that said, there are valid points to criticize Casual Breakthrough. Some users have pointed out that it could increase wait times even longer for different playlists due to the sheer number of options currently available. Similarly, some areas often face mostly bots in the current modes. Additionally, it appears somewhat counterintuitive that the mode does not begin without a minimum number of real players, despite it focuses mostly on combat against bots.

Finally, one of the biggest complaints is that a previous feature was promised to provide complete rewards, including AI matches, but that was removed when they attempted to eliminate bot farms from the system. So Casual Breakthrough seems like the community compromising in the middle, as per forum feedback. Another labels this addition as the devs "making a mistake so hard, I experienced great enjoyment in the initial release, why did they feel the need to adjust it?"

Future Prospects: Will Changes Be Made?

If the development team has proven anything to date with the latest installment, it's that they're paying attention and responding to feedback. Tasks being too difficult got fixed rapidly, as did the specific battle pass objectives. It is likely that, if their data indicates this new playlist is underperforming to their standards, they won't be shy to change it again.