🔗 Share this article

Nicolas Cage is likely the ideal pick for a bold scary movie about the biblical figure, but not for the causes many fans might assume. In reality, the star does not actually portray the central religious figure in the new film: his character is listed only as The Carpenter. Cage is cast as the Joseph within this narrative, working to maintain his faith as his son (acted by Noah Jupe), their adolescent foster child, begins to exhibit supernatural abilities. The reason it's hard to picture a different leading star in this role is that although his character grows burdened with various difficulties, the actor seems almost moving convinced that this dark, grim small film is a valuable project.

Cage's Current Film Selections

Nicolas Cage was spending that time more selectively recently. He continues to does more films than most regular audiences may ever watch — as an illustration, were you informed that the man has completed a trio of separate Westerns over the last few years? — but he also includes esteemed critically acclaimed roles for example Dream Scenario, another notable movie, and Longlegs. The Carpenter’s Son sounds like a similar project, because it’s not strictly scary, potentially provocative, and handles a exaggerated concept quite seriously.

Movie's Storyline and Direction

Sadly, filmmaker Lotfy Nathan does not reward viewer engagement. The film starts from a engagingly rootless setting, positioned as based on an apocryphal lost gospel about the early years of Jesus. The Carpenter, the maternal figure, and their son travel frequently, fearful of faith-based hostility or suspicion about The Boy’s unusual abilities. “Disaster trails us,” The Carpenter gloomily remarks. It goes on as sinister entities attack them where they currently live, beginning on that familiar Biblical temptation for the youth.

Sometimes, the movie resembles an Exorcist-style possession movie, except that not one of the main figures are clearly inhabited. Instead, they are more and more distant from one another, when these forces infect a nearby girl (the actress, named “The Stranger”) who the son forms a relationship with, and presents everyone unsettling premonitions of a grim future. The Carpenter in particular struggles with his role in the narrative, occasionally scolding the son who mystifies him.

Discussion and Care

This material is prone to court controversy, and Nathan approaches it with plenty of care — too much, maybe. The concept of a young man dealing with his destined offering and seduced by dark influences is indeed terrifying, but the filmmaker could be wary of seeming gratuitous and anxious to indicate his goals, thus he frequently retreats into dimly foreboding visuals. Characters brood incessantly — the singer-actress, who displayed notable talent in another movie, of all things — yields her acting to her religious attire, at times punctuated by several disturbing frightening scenes.

The Star's Acting and Film's Shortcomings

Meanwhile, Cage dabbles in precisely the type of overacting that those who enjoy his campier roles could be expecting. An instance (also included) in promotional material where he flips out and screams “My faith has been shattered!” When this sort of dramatic explosion is a component of your biblical thriller, maybe a more boldly ridiculous style would be more effective of Cage’s willingness to go over the top when necessary. Rather, the film more closely resembles the weaker direct-to-video films the actor filmed during that period — not the cheesy thrillers instead the serious stories and supernatural thrillers that often seem intriguing, and usually have a few choice actor's highlights, but in the end seem like, indeed, low-budget DTV material.

Truthfully, some of those, although simpler, were more entertaining in general. This is when I must disregard my personal rule, not religious but career-related: Years back, a beloved editor persuaded me to remove words like “monotonous” or “lifeless” from my film-criticism vocabulary. Such terms communicate minimal other than a personal and broadly stated restlessness, avoiding the job of vividly conveying the mental and emotional experience of seeing a particular movie. It's hard to convey monotony without sounding boring oneself. It's just as unclear as calling a movie “notable.” “Elaborate,” that is.

But I must confess, I was bored during much of The Carpenter’s Son. On the positive side, it is a churchy kind of dullness, not because this movie is lecturing, but because it takes a sort of dutiful submission to view it. After a while early on, this feature locks into a repetitive rhythm of simmering anguish, and does not